Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) - measures the client’s perspective of change or improvement (or lack thereof) in relation to where they started.

For two decades, the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) has repeatedly been proven to be a reliable and valid therapeutic instrument that can be easily and effectively incorporated into any therapist-client session (Miller, Duncan, Brown, Sparks, & Claud, 2003; Bringhurst, Watson, Miller, & Duncan, 2006; Campbell & Hemsley, 2009). Further evidence has been accumuating that demonstrates the generalizability of the ORS to a variety of clinical populations and settings: couples, addictions, adolescents, groups, and much more (Anker, Duncan, & Sparks, 2009).

With MyOutcomes®, the ORS takes less than a minute to administer, and the results can then be compared to a predicted score derived from calculations based on data from nearly three-quarters-of-a-million other administrations. The brevity of our ORS makes for an extremely feasible tool that can easily be completed by clients at the beginning or end of each therapeutic session. Although feedback does lead to improved outcomes, it has been demonstrated that regular solicitation of feedback is significantly more effective (Reese, Norsworthy, & Rowlans, 2009).

MyOutcomes Outcome Rating Scale

Using four visual scales, the ORS is a brief outcome measure that enables clients to provide feedback on their perceptions of their progress in achieving their therapeutic goals. Specifically, the four scales allow the client to provide a quantifiable measure of how they are functioning on a personal level, in their interpersonal relationships (friends and family), their general social interactions, as well as a more global measure of their overall functioning.

MyOutcomes® automatically plots each session’s ORS on a continuous graph so that the therapist can determine if the trajectory of change is on or off track.

References:

Duncan, B., Miller, S., Sparks, J., Claud, D., Reynolds, L., Brown, J., & Johnson, L. (2003). The Session Rating Scale: preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measurement. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3(1), 3-12.

Anker, M. G., Duncan, B. L., & Sparks, J. A. (2009). Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 77, 693–704. doi:10.1037/a0016062

APA Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 4, 271-285.

Bringhurst, D.L., Watson, C.W., Miller, S.D. & Duncan, B.L. (2006). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Rating Scale: A replication study of a brief clinical measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5, 1, 23-30.

Campbell, A & Hemsley, S. (2009). Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13, 1, 1-9.

Miller, S.D., Duncan, B.L., Brown, J., Sparks, J.A. & Claud, D.A. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2, 2, 91-100.

Norcross, J.C. & Wampold, B.E. (2011). Evidence-based therapy relationships: Research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy, 1, 98-102. doi: 10.1037/a0022161.

Reese, R., Norsworthy, L., & Rowlands, S. (2009). Does a Continuous Feedback Model Improve Psychotherapy Outcome?Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 46, 418-431.